Re: [PATCH resubmit] do_mount: reduce stack consumption

> > If you don't like this one too, could you please explain what should be
> > changed?
> 
> Depth analysis.  E.g. do_move_mount() change is simply nonsense - _this_
> is not going to overflow, no matter what.  And do_add_mount() change
> is also very suspicious - looks like you are attacking the wrong place
> in call chain.

You're right (see also my other reply to Andrew).

Thanks,
Heiko

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH resubmit] do_mount: reduce stack consumption
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH resubmit] do_mount: reduce stack consumption
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH resubmit] do_mount: reduce stack consumption
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH resubmit] do_mount: reduce stack consumption
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: mem_init crash for sparsemem
• Next by Date: [PATCH] export ia64_max_cacheline_size
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH resubmit] do_mount: reduce stack consumption
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH resubmit] do_mount: reduce stack consumption
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]