On Freedag 04 November 2005 21:18, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Would it not make sense to use pfn_valid(), as that is not sparsemem
> specific? Not looked at the code in question specifically, but if you
> can use section_has_mem_map() it should be equivalent:
>
> if (!pfn_valid(pgdat->node_start_pfn + i))
> continue;
>
> Want to spin us a patch and I'll give it some general testing.
Yes, I guess pfn_valid() is the function I was looking for, thanks
for pointing that out.
Unfortunately, I don't have access to the machine over the weekend,
so I won't be able to test that until Monday.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
