On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:20:55AM -0600, John Rose was heard to remark:
> > This patch fixes a bug related to dlpar PHB add, after a PHB removal.
>
> This and patch 18 seem logically separate from the feature. This
> complicates review and adds to an already large patch set. Could we
> handle these separately?
I sent these in separetely, a month ago, as bug fixes for the dlpar
crashes in the pre-2.6.14 kernels, but these were never applied.
Since they're needed to get EEH to work, I just sent them in again
with this set. Yes, I'm aware that the patch you sent yesterday
fixes the same bug in almost the same way.
What you really want to concentrate on are patches 20 through 23
which mess with the guts of the rpaphp code. But again, these are
the same old patches, they have not changed since the submit last
month.
--linas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
