Ingo wrote:
> Seriously, while nr_swapped_in_pages ought to be OK, i think there is a
> generic problem with /proc based stats.
>
> System instrumentation people are already complaining about how costly
> /proc parsing is. If you have to get some nontrivial stat from all
> threads in the system, and if Linux doesnt offer that counter or summary
> by default, it gets pretty expensive.
Agreed.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Gerrit Huizenga <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [patch] swapin rlimit
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] swapin rlimit
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] swapin rlimit
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] swapin rlimit
- Next by Date: Re: Kernel BUG
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] swapin rlimit
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] swapin rlimit
- Index(es):
 |