Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> A per-task stat requires walking the tasklist, to build a list of the
> tasks to query.

Nope, just task->mm->whatever.

> A raw counter requires repeated polling to determine the recent rate of
> activity.

True.

> The filtered per-cpuset rate avoids any need to repeatedly access
> global resources such as the tasklist, and minimizes the total cpu
> cycles required to get the interesting stat.
> 

Well no.  Because the filtered-whatsit takes two spinlocks and does a bunch
of arith for each and every task, each time it calls try_to_free_pages(). 
The frequency of that could be very high indeed, even when nobody is
interested in the metric which is being maintained(!).

And I'd suggest that only a minority of workloads would be interested in
this metric?

ergo, polling the thing once per five seconds in those situations where we
actually want to poll the thing may well be cheaper, in global terms?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/