Re: [PATCH] I8K: convert to seqfile

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 06:03:50PM -0700, Linux Kernel wrote:
 > tree e76bf5589246831604130349ae67b30b998deb29
 > parent e70c9d5e61c6cb2272c866fc1303e62975006752
 > author Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net> Sun, 26 Jun 2005 04:54:26 -0700
 > committer Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org> Sun, 26 Jun 2005 06:24:24 -0700
 > 
 > [PATCH] I8K: convert to seqfile
 > 
 > I8K: Change proc code to use seq_file.
 > 
 > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
 > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
 > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
 > 
 >  drivers/char/i8k.c |   64 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
 >  1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

This took a while to notice somehow, but one of our Fedora users
upgraded from a 2.6.12 kernel to 2.6.14 today, and noticed
that his gkrellm segfaulted[1].

The reason is that we've subtley changed the format of /proc/i8k

Before:
1.0 A38 ? 54 -22 1 -22 79260 -1 2

After:
1.0 A38  52 -22 1 -22 77340 -1 2


The missing '?' field is puzzling though. Looking at the diff,
this should work.  Is this a shortfalling of seq_file perhaps ?

		Dave

[1] The i8k plugin for that thing is hurrendous btw, don't
look at it with a weak stomach. It does no sanity checking
on arguments at all, and assumes things will stay constant.
Little wonder it blows up when it runs out of things to strcpy()

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/