Re: [discuss] Re: [stable] Re: 4GB memory and Intel Dual-Core system

On Monday 31 October 2005 22:04, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Dave Jones ([email protected]) wrote:
> > The following patch Andi forwarded never actually made it into 2.6.14.
> > Definite 2.6.14.1 material IMO.
>
> Thanks, queued to -stable.  Also, this one is still not upstream.

Will be soon, but in general I would prefer if you didn't merge anything
into STABLE that wasn't upstream yet. Otherwise we risk code drift again.

Thanks,
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [stable] Re: 4GB memory and Intel Dual-Core system
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: 4GB memory and Intel Dual-Core system
    • From: Lukas Hejtmanek <[email protected]>
  • Re: 4GB memory and Intel Dual-Core system
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] Re: 4GB memory and Intel Dual-Core system
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [was Re: Linux 2.6.14 ] Revert "x86-64: Avoid unnecessary double bouncing for swiotlb"
• Next by Date: Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
• Previous by thread: Re: [stable] Re: 4GB memory and Intel Dual-Core system
• Next by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: [stable] Re: 4GB memory and Intel Dual-Core system
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]