Re: First steps towards making NO_IRQ a generic concept

On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 07:51 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Introduce PCI_NO_IRQ and pci_valid_irq()
> Explicitly initialise pci_dev->irq with PCI_NO_IRQ, allowing us to change
> the value of PCI_NO_IRQ when all drivers have been audited.


can pci_valid_irq() accept a device instead of a number?
that allows a lot more checks later on (like "is it enabled") and other
such checks. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • First steps towards making NO_IRQ a generic concept
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
  • Re: First steps towards making NO_IRQ a generic concept
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: x86_64: 2.6.14 with NUMA panics at boot
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
• Previous by thread: Re: First steps towards making NO_IRQ a generic concept
• Next by thread: Re: First steps towards making NO_IRQ a generic concept
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]