On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:43:12PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> > Looks sane to me. Can you carry this in the ocfs2 tree?
>
> No problem. Give us a day or two to merge the changes to our
> main trees.
I think I disagree with Andew here. Having a core patch separate
from a new drivers/filesystem/etc.. is always a good idea. It makes
reviewing a lot easier and allows independant handling, e.g. merging it
earlier than the new driver for some reason - as happened for example
with the clear_inode changes we needed earlier for ocfs or the pagevec
exports that came in via the reiser4 patches but were needed in mainline
for cifs now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
