Re: best way to handle LEDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:57:26AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > Except the led code that is being proposed CAN sit on top of a generic
> > > GPIO layer.
> > 
> > I also have issues with a generic GPIO layer.  As I mentioned in the
> > past, there's serious locking issues with any generic abstraction of
> > GPIOs.
> > 
> > 1. You want to be able to change GPIO state from interrupts.  This
> >    implies you can not sleep in GPIO state changing functions.
> > 
> > 2. Some GPIOs are implemented on I2C devices.  This means that to
> >    change state, you must sleep.
> 
> Can't you just busywait? Yes, it is ugly in general, but perhaps it
> is better than alternatives...

Does the i2c layer support busy waiting or are you suggesting something
else?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux