Re: [PATCH 24/37] dvb: dst: protect the read/write commands with a mutex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Michael Krufky <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/37] dvb: dst: protect the read/write commands with a mutex
From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 13:57:35 +1100
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], Manu Abraham <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Michael Krufky <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +	sema_init(&state->dst_mutex, 1);

We normally use init_MUTEX(), so we don't have to remember that 1 == unlocked.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 24/37] dvb: dst: protect the read/write commands with a mutex
  - From: Manu Abraham <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 24/37] dvb: dst: protect the read/write commands with a mutex
  - From: Michael Krufky <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 12/12: eCryptfs] Crypto functions
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 26/37] dvb: add support for plls used by nxt200x
Previous by thread: [PATCH 24/37] dvb: dst: protect the read/write commands with a mutex
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 24/37] dvb: dst: protect the read/write commands with a mutex
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux