Hi Greg,
thanks for your review.
Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 12:37:41AM +0200, matthieu castet wrote:
Please comment and consider for inclusion.
I need a "Signed-off-by:" line in order to be able to add it. Care to
redo things based on the comments you have had and resend it with this
line?
no problem ;)
+ *
+ * This software is available to you under a choice of one of two
+ * licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU
+ * General Public License (GPL) Version 2, available from the file
+ * COPYING in the main directory of this source tree, or the
+ * BSD license below:
+ *
+ * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+ * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
+ * are met:
<snip> You don't need the whole GPL 2 copy here, just put the first
paragraph you have before this one in.
The paragraph you quote is the BSD licence, and point 1 is :
Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice unmodified, this list of conditions, and the following
* disclaimer
So could I remove it ?
+/*
+ * sometime hotplug don't have time to give the firmware the
+ * first time, retry it.
+ */
+static int sleepy_request_firmware(const struct firmware **fw,
+ const char *name, struct device *dev)
+{
+ if (request_firmware(fw, name, dev) == 0)
+ return 0;
+ msleep(1000);
+ return request_firmware(fw, name, dev);
+}
No, use the async firmware download mode instead of this. That will
solve all of your problems.
Thanks, but does userspace will retry if it fails the first time ?
The device needs the firmware quickly and after 3-5 seconds without it,
it goes berserk.
+/* we need to use semaphore until sysfs and removable devices is fixed
+ * the problem is explained on http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=112006484100003
+ */
This is the proper fix, why do you think it should be fixed in the
driver core?
I don't remember, but aren't any possible race in sysfs code ?
In the read, after the up, the usb_disconnect is scheduled, and call
device_remove_file. Is that ok for the sysfs code to be still in the
read code ?
An other case : a process open a file, and start a read. Before the down
, the usb_disconnect is scheduled and the module is removed.
What will do the read, run code from the removed code ?
diff -rNu -x '*.ko*' -x '*.mod*' -x '*.o*' linux-2.6.14/drivers/usb/atm.old/ueagle-atm.h linux-2.6.14/drivers/usb/atm/ueagle-atm.h
--- linux-2.6.14/drivers/usb/atm.old/ueagle-atm.h 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.14/drivers/usb/atm/ueagle-atm.h 2005-10-30 00:25:27.000000000 +0200
Why do you need a header file for a single .c file?
I think it makes things cleaner. I even like the bsd style where there
is an header for reg (hardware values) and an other for val (driver
structures).
>>+#define PACKED __attribute__ ((packed))
>
>
> No, spell it out please.
>
>
>>+/* structure describing a block within a DSP page */
>>+typedef struct {
>>+ __le16 wHdr;
>>+#define UEA_BIHDR 0xabcd
>>+ __le16 wAddress;
>>+ __le16 wSize;
>>+ __le16 wOvlOffset;
>>+ __le16 wOvl; /* overlay */
>>+ __le16 wLast;
>>+} PACKED block_info_t;
>
>
> Do not create new typedefs. Please get rid of all of them.
It comes from bsd driver, it will be cleaned.
thanks,
Matthieu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]