Re: any fairness in NTPL pthread mutexes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Friesen wrote:

I'm using NPTL.

If I have a pthread mutex currently owned by a task, and two other tasks try to lock it, when the mutex is unlocked, are there any rules about the order in which the waiting tasks get the mutex (ie priority, FIFO, etc.)?

Thanks,

Chris
-

There is no fairness at all. It's currently not designed to be fair either. The reasons for this I can't remember, but there was talk at the KS about it and I just remember the answer. I think it had something to do with "If we implement fairness, general locking performance will drop and we prefer performance over fairness."

The solution is to modify your program so as not to rely on fairness.

James

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux