Re: cpuset - question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm not sure of the true answer; it is likely that CPUSETS was
designed in the 2.4 timeframe and compatibility was preferred over the
clean sysfs interface.

I've CC'd the authors.

Dan

On 11/2/05, Randy.Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> >
> > Janos,
> >
> > You can see what valid memory nodes are available from the top-level
> > cpuset directory:
> >
> > # cat /dev/cpuset/mems
> > 0 1 2 3
> >
> > If you were to be running on a NUMA-capable system, you'd also want to
> > ensure page interleaving was disabled in the BIOS/pre-boot firmware
> > too.
>
> Just for info, why is this in /dev at all, instead of, say,
> /sys ??
>
> --
> ~Randy
___
Daniel J Blueman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux