Re: PATCH: EDAC - clean up atomic stuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mer, 2005-11-02 at 16:26 +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well if we retain KM_BOUNCE_READ then we'll need local_irq_save().  If
> edac_mc_scrub_block() will alwyas be called from process context then we
> can use KM_USER0 and leave interrupts enabled.
> 
> Alan, can you confirm please?

Probably best to local_irq_save. Especially considering the likely
direction of updates once it is merged

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux