On Mer, 2005-11-02 at 16:26 +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well if we retain KM_BOUNCE_READ then we'll need local_irq_save(). If
> edac_mc_scrub_block() will alwyas be called from process context then we
> can use KM_USER0 and leave interrupts enabled.
>
> Alan, can you confirm please?
Probably best to local_irq_save. Especially considering the likely
direction of updates once it is merged
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]