Re: New (now current development process)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Mo 31.10.2005 05:52 schrieb Rob Landley <[email protected]>:

> On Sunday 30 October 2005 18:45, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The problem is that -mm* contains typically so many more or less
> > broken changes that any extensive work on there is futile
> > because you never know whose bugs you're debugging
> > (and if the patch that is broken will even make it anywhere)
> >
> > In short mainline is frozen too long and -mm* is too unstable.
>
> Are you implying that if mainline wasn't frozen so much, it would
> still be
> more stable than -mm?

Yes. Historically 2.<odd> kernels were like this.
 
-Andi
 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux