Re: [PATCH consolidate sys_ptrace

[Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>]

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:12:21AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:09:00AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Some architectures have a too different ptrace so we have to exclude
> > them.  They continue to keep their implementations.  For sh64 I had to
> > add a sh64_ptrace wrapper because it does some initialization on the
> > first call.  For um I removed an ifdefed SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL block,
> > but SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL isn't defined anywhere in the tree.
> 
> Umm, it might be a good idea to actually send the current patch instead
> of the old one.  I really should write this text from scratch instead
> of copying it :)
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
sh and sh64 bits look fine, thanks.

Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

Attachment: pgpqiHqYCmCjz.pgp
Description: PGP signature