Re: [PATCH consolidate sys_ptrace

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:12:21AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:09:00AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Some architectures have a too different ptrace so we have to exclude
> > them.  They continue to keep their implementations.  For sh64 I had to
> > add a sh64_ptrace wrapper because it does some initialization on the
> > first call.  For um I removed an ifdefed SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL block,
> > but SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL isn't defined anywhere in the tree.
> 
> Umm, it might be a good idea to actually send the current patch instead
> of the old one.  I really should write this text from scratch instead
> of copying it :)
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> 
sh and sh64 bits look fine, thanks.

Acked-by: Paul Mundt <[email protected]>

Attachment: pgpqiHqYCmCjz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• References:
  • [PATCH consolidate sys_ptrace
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH consolidate sys_ptrace
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: alsa 2.6.14 record problem
• Next by Date: Re: [BUG 2579] linux 2.6.* sound problems
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH consolidate sys_ptrace
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH consolidate sys_ptrace
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]