On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 08:44:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 of November 2005 20:14, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > Thanks Rafael,
> >
> > could you try this patch instead? I hate to keep these state variables
> > and thats why i went with the preempt approach, too bad it seems it wont
> > work for more than just the case you mentioned.
> >
> > seems ugly, but i dont find a better looking cure...
>
> It fixes my problem.
>
Thanks,
Andrew: please consider for -mm
--
Cheers,
Ashok Raj
- Open Source Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
