On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 18:18 +0100, Patrizio Bassi wrote:
> Jeffrey Hundstad ha scritto:
>
> > Since you're going to 250 Hz. Please, if you would, see if you can
> > tell any performance change and report that as well. I'm more than a
> > little skeptical that you'll notice. BTW: Your battery life should be
> > a little better at 100 Hz also.
> >
> sincerely i can notice that task and application switching is a bit slower.
> i have a 500mhz cpu so i think i can notice a bit the difference.
> i can't estimate it mmm...
> i'll say no more that 5-8%.
> but i don't know where i'm gaining speed..
Um, wasn't a consensus reached at OLS two years ago that the target for
desktop responsiveness would be 1ms which is impossible with HZ=100 or
250?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
