Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch

Hi,

On Monday, 31 of October 2005 22:42, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Well I can't find it.  Ingo, didn't you have a debug patch which would 
> > help us identify where this atomic section started?
> 
> yes. Find below the preempt-trace.patch, updated and merged to 2.6.14.
> 
> Rafael, just enable CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT and repeat the reproducer.

Thanks a lot, but it was not necessary in this particular case (please see
my reply to the Ashok's post).

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- 2.6.14-git3: scheduling while atomic from cpufreq on Athlon64
  - From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-git3: scheduling while atomic from cpufreq on Athlon64
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [patch] preempt-trace.patch
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.14-git3: scheduling while atomic from cpufreq on Athlon64
Next by Date: [PATCH] typo correction for fix-build-on-nls-free-systems
Previous by thread: [patch] preempt-trace.patch
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.14-git3: scheduling while atomic from cpufreq on Athlon64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]