Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I really don't think we *want* to say we support higher order allocations
> absolutely robustly, nor do we want people using them if possible. Because
> we don't. Even with your patches.
> 
> Ingo also brought up this point at Ottawa.

Some of the driver issues can be fixed by scatter-gather DMA *if* the 
h/w supports it. But what exactly do you propose to do about kernel
stacks, etc? By the time you've fixed all the individual usages of it,
frankly, it would be easier to provide a generic mechanism to fix the 
problem ...
 
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux