Re: [PATCH] swsusp: rework swsusp_suspend

Hi!

> The following patch makes only the functions in swsusp.c call functions in
> snapshot.c and not both ways.  It also moves the check for available swap
> out of swsusp_suspend() which is necessary for separating the swap-handling
> functions in swsusp from the core code.

Moving highmem handling code is not neccessary for this goal, right?
Please keep it in place.

(You being x86-64 person, I can understand you don't want it in
snapshot.c ;-)

								Pavel
-- 
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] swsusp: rework swsusp_suspend
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] swsusp: rework swsusp_suspend
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] SHM_NORESERVE flags for shmget()
• Next by Date: Re: any fairness in NTPL pthread mutexes?
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] swsusp: rework swsusp_suspend
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: rework swsusp_suspend
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]