Re: AMD Geode GX/LX Support (Refreshed)

> Does this mean you've now done actual performance analysis on whether
> this is a good idea for Geode GX/LX ?


I'm fairly sure that the ppro checksum is faster, but you're exactly right,
we should publish some numbers.  Mia culpa.

Jordan

-- 
Jordan Crouse
Senior Linux Engineer
AMD - Personal Connectivity Solutions Group
<www.amd.com/embeddedprocessors>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/6] AMD Geode GX/LX Support (Refreshed)
    • From: "Jordan Crouse" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/6] AMD Geode GX/LX Support (Refreshed)
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [BUG 2579] linux 2.6.* sound problems
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.14-rt1 - xruns in a certain circumstance
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/6] AMD Geode GX/LX Support (Refreshed)
• Next by thread: Re: AMD Geode GX/LX Support (Refreshed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]