On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:46:42AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > IIRC, this was to allow future code to specify preferences for the type of
> > algorithm driver (e.g. hardware), but has not been used. This is an
> > example of why it's a bad idea to add infrastructure which isn't being
> > used at the time.
>
> Since it's still unused, a patch to remove this second argument is
> below.
I'll be using this field very soon to indicate that the caller intends
to find synchronous algorithms only as opposed to either synchronous or
asynchronous. So I'd like to keep it for now.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]