Re: [parisc-linux] [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"

On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 02:03:01AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> "extern inline" doesn't make much sense.

Are you sure?  It used to.  Taking just one sample, pgd_none:

extern inline: alpha, parisc, s390
static inline: frv, ppc, sh64
define: arm, arm26, frv, h8300, m68knommu, ppc64, v850

I really don't think it makes any difference.  Such a function (returning
always 0) is always going to be inlined, and the only difference between
static inline and extern inline is what happens when it can't be inlined.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [parisc-linux] [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [parisc-linux] [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] schedule obsolete OSS drivers for removal
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.14-git1 (and -git2) build failure on AMD64
• Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
• Next by thread: Re: [parisc-linux] [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]