Re: [parisc-linux] [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"

On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 02:03:01AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> "extern inline" doesn't make much sense.

Are you sure?  It used to.  Taking just one sample, pgd_none:

extern inline: alpha, parisc, s390
static inline: frv, ppc, sh64
define: arm, arm26, frv, h8300, m68knommu, ppc64, v850

I really don't think it makes any difference.  Such a function (returning
always 0) is always going to be inlined, and the only difference between
static inline and extern inline is what happens when it can't be inlined.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [parisc-linux] [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [parisc-linux] [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

References:
- [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] schedule obsolete OSS drivers for removal
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.14-git1 (and -git2) build failure on AMD64
Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
Next by thread: Re: [parisc-linux] [2.6 patch] parisc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]