Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages

Paul Jackson wrote:

Nick wrote:

See how can_try_harder and gfp_high is used currently.

Ah - by "current" you meant in Linus's or Andrew's tree,
not as in Seth's current patch.  Since they are booleans,
rather than tri-values, using an enum is overkill.  Ok.

Yup.

Now I'm one less clue short of understanding.  Thanks.

I'll be more constructive next time round, and provide an
actual patch to address any of my remaining concerns after
this latest round of feedback.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
    • From: "Rohit, Seth" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]