Re: [PATCH] toshiba_ohci1394_dmi_table should be __devinitdata, not __devinit

[Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>]

On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 07:43:59AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Friday, October 28, 2005 9:50 pm, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > I don't really understand why gcc gives the error it does, but
> > without this patch, when building with CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n, I get errors
> > like:
> >
> >       CC      arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/fixup.o
> >     arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/fixup.c: In function
> > `pci_fixup_i450nx': arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/fixup.c:13: error:
> > pci_fixup_i450nx causes a section type conflict
> >
> > The change is obviously correct: an array should be declared
> > __devinitdata rather that __devinit.
> 
> Oops, yeah I think this is correct.  We should also mark 
> toshiba_line_size as __devinitdata.  Patch relative to yours.

Why?  Is it really worth it?  2 bytes?  Ick.

It's time to just make CONFIG_HOTPLUG always on to keep messes like this
from happening...

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/