On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 18:41 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 29 October 2005 16:54, Janne M O Heikkinen wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Janne M O Heikkinen wrote:
> >
> > > No, I get same panics with numa=noacpi or even with numa=off. If I compile
> > > 2.6.14 kernel without CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA it does boot.
> >
> > It wasn't removing of CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA that made it boot after all, I had
> > also changed memory model from "Sparse" to "Discontiguous". And now
> > when I recompiled with CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA=y and with "Discontiguous" memory
> > model it booted just fine.
>
> Ok, that would explain it. I never test sparse, only discontiguous.
> sparse is only an experimental option that is not really maintained
> yet. Probably need to disable it if it's broken.
>
> Perhaps Dave H. knows what to do with it.
I'll try to dig up an Opteron machine on Monday and see what I can do.
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
