Re: building 2.4.31 for a non-smp system

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:18:12 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:

>Is your problem reproducible when starting from a freshly unpacked 
>2.4.31 tree?

Nope - see my earlier post.  Thanks the fast response. 

>BTW: Please don't strip people from the Cc when replying to 
>     linux-kernel.

Sorry about that - I'm feeding the list into a news-server, and the ccs got
unintentionally stripped.


regards
Per

-- 
regards,
Per Jessen, Zurich
http://www.spamchek.com - let your spam stop here!


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: building 2.4.31 for a non-smp system
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.14-git1 fails compile -- i386/pci/fixup.c
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/etherdevice.h, kernel 2.6.14
Previous by thread: Re: building 2.4.31 for a non-smp system
Next by thread: segmentation fault when accessing /proc/ioports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]