Re: building 2.4.31 for a non-smp system

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:18:12 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:

>Is your problem reproducible when starting from a freshly unpacked 
>2.4.31 tree?

Nope - see my earlier post.  Thanks the fast response. 

>BTW: Please don't strip people from the Cc when replying to 
>     linux-kernel.

Sorry about that - I'm feeding the list into a news-server, and the ccs got
unintentionally stripped.


regards
Per

-- 
regards,
Per Jessen, Zurich
http://www.spamchek.com - let your spam stop here!


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: building 2.4.31 for a non-smp system
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.14-git1 fails compile -- i386/pci/fixup.c
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/etherdevice.h, kernel 2.6.14
• Previous by thread: Re: building 2.4.31 for a non-smp system
• Next by thread: segmentation fault when accessing /proc/ioports
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]