Re: Weirdness of "mount -o remount,rw" with write-protected floppy

Rob Landley wrote:

On the other hand, umount is supposed to flush all the data

by the time it returns yet still it succeeded.


Is that guaranteed?  Or do you need to pass some weird flag to umount?

I believe this is the default behavior. How otherwise do you know whenit's safe to eject/disconnect a removable media (floppy, USBdisk-on-key,...)?


Regards,

Evgeny
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Weirdness of "mount -o remount,rw" with write-protected floppy
  - From: Evgeny Stambulchik <[email protected]>
- Re: Weirdness of "mount -o remount,rw" with write-protected floppy
  - From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: Weirdness of "mount -o remount,rw" with write-protected floppy
  - From: Evgeny Stambulchik <[email protected]>
- Re: Weirdness of "mount -o remount,rw" with write-protected floppy
  - From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] bluetooth hidp is broken on s390
Next by Date: [PATCH] type fix in arm/boot/compressed/misc.c
Previous by thread: Re: Weirdness of "mount -o remount,rw" with write-protected floppy
Next by thread: Re: Weirdness of "mount -o remount,rw" with write-protected floppy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]