[email protected] wrote:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5039
>
Well this is a depressing saga. A bunch of people whose machines appear to
be spending 50% CPU time in softirq processing. Some find that `noapic'
fixes it and some dont. Some are on x86_64, some are on x86.
I suspect we have multiple bugs here. It's quite a mess.
Could the reporters please, via a reply-to-all to this email:
a) test 2.6.14.
b) summarise the current status of your bug (what CPU type, what are the
symptoms, any known workarounds, etc).
c) Generate a kernel profile (see Documentation/basic_profiling.txt)
Generally, let's get a bit of action happening here and see if we can get
these relatively long-standing regressions fixed up, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
