On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 07:59:54AM +0200, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> And on an philosophical plane, can/should we put that responsibility onto
> the compiler? Is it not "easier" to make the functions take care
> of its own duties (like the *nix-way) and make the bvec_alloc_bs initialize
> idx (even if it has to be an error-value)?
>
> I'm thinking something like this. Seems alright?
No. Working around the false positives in compiler warning system is
*wrong*. _IF_ it cares to inline the function and generate the
warnings based on that, it is responsible for doing it right.
It's a gcc bug, plain and simple.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
