Felix Oxley wrote:
Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> Kernel performance data for 2.6.14 (released yesterday) is updated at:
> http://kernel-perf.sourceforge.net
>
> As expected, results are within run variation compares to 2.6.14-rc5.
> No significant deviation found compare to 2.6.14-rc5
>
There seems to be some regression here:
System: 4P Xeon
Test:Result Group 8
Metric: 64KB_4_fread
Result: +1.9% -15%
Kernel: 2.6.14-rc4 vs 2.6.14-rc4-git4
System: 2P Xeon
Test:Result Group 7
Metric: ODIRECT
Kernel: 2.6.14-rc5 vs 2.6.14-rc5-git3
Summary: Write has increased whereas Read has decreased by 4-5 %
Something went horribly wrong with this test between 2.6.13 and
2.6.13-git2 (it has never recovered):
System: 4P Itanium
Test:Result Group 1
Metric: VolcanoMark
Result: -3% -10%
Kernel: 2.6.13 vs 2.6.13-git2
Does anybody know the cause of this?
regards,
Felix
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]