Verified. These numbers reflect my measurements as well. I have not
moved off 2.6.9 to newer kernels on shipping products due to these
issues. There are also serious stability issues as well, though 2.6.14
seems a little better than than previous kernels.
Jeff
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
Kernel performance data for 2.6.14 (released yesterday) is updated at:
http://kernel-perf.sourceforge.net
As expected, results are within run variation compares to 2.6.14-rc5.
No significant deviation found compare to 2.6.14-rc5
Do I read this correctly: according to your benchmarks, fileio-noop
and fileio-cfq are down some 20% or more, across all machine
configurations, since 2.6.9? In the 4P configuration, dbench-{noop,as}
both seem to have regressed as well.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]