On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 08:56:54PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:45:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Ugh, ok, at least I wasn't that far off. I'll make sure to not send the
> > usb pm patches in the round of usb updates until that gets figured out.
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:47:50PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Just to verify: that one isn't in the current driver core tree, right? I
> > assume that's in Greg's USB tree..
>
> Greg,
>
> Any chance of putting my driver model changes into the driver core tree?
They are in there already. :)
> ISTR the reason they ended up in the USB tree was because they clashed
> with the usb-pm patches. However, if the usb-pm patches are
> problematical, I'd rather my driver model changes weren't held up.
They have not been held up. I made the required usb-pm fixups already,
based on your patches. They are dependant on your changes, not the
other way around.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
