Re: [PATCH] 2.6.14-rc4: wider use of for_each_*cpu() in net

On 10/13/05, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> In 'net' change the explicit use of for-loops and NR_CPUS into the
> general for_each_cpu() or for_each_online_cpu() constructs, as
> appropriate.  This widens the scope of potential future optimizations
> of the general constructs, as well as takes advantage of the existing
> optimizations of first_cpu() and next_cpu(), which is advantageous
> when the true CPU count is much smaller than NR_CPUS.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Hawkes <[email protected]>

Thanks, applied and pushed to Linus,

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] 2.6.14-rc4: wider use of for_each_*cpu() in net
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: AMD Athlon64 X2 Dual-core and 4GB
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] 2.6.14-rc4: wider use of for_each_*cpu() in net
• Next by thread: [patch] remove gendisk->stamp_idle field
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]