Re: [PATCH] DRIVER MODEL: Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks

At Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:30:27 -0700,
Greg KH wrote:
> 
> --- a/Documentation/driver-model/driver.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-model/driver.txt
> @@ -196,67 +196,11 @@ it into a supported low-power state.
>  
>  	int	(*suspend)	(struct device * dev, pm_message_t state, u32 level);
>  

Shouldn't this be also changed without level argument?


> +suspend is called to put the device in a low power state.
>  
>  	int	(*resume)	(struct device * dev, u32 level);
>  

Ditto.


Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] DRIVER MODEL: Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks
  - From: Russell King <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] kernel-doc: drivers/base fixes
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] DRIVER MODEL: Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY, 2.4] Avoid 'names_cache' memory leak with CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
Next by Date: Re: better wake-balancing: respin
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] DRIVER MODEL: Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] DRIVER MODEL: Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]