Re: [PATCH] DRIVER MODEL: Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks

At Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:30:27 -0700,
Greg KH wrote:
> 
> --- a/Documentation/driver-model/driver.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-model/driver.txt
> @@ -196,67 +196,11 @@ it into a supported low-power state.
>  
>  	int	(*suspend)	(struct device * dev, pm_message_t state, u32 level);
>  

Shouldn't this be also changed without level argument?


> +suspend is called to put the device in a low power state.
>  
>  	int	(*resume)	(struct device * dev, u32 level);
>  

Ditto.


Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] DRIVER MODEL: Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] kernel-doc: drivers/base fixes
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] DRIVER MODEL: Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY, 2.4] Avoid 'names_cache' memory leak with CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
• Next by Date: Re: better wake-balancing: respin
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] DRIVER MODEL: Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] DRIVER MODEL: Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]