Re: [PATCH] Process Events Connector

On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 01:55 -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:

> +void proc_fork_connector(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +	struct cn_msg *msg;
> +	struct proc_event *ev;
> +	__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE];

do you really want to do this stack based?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Process Events Connector
    • From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Process Events Connector
    • From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] DRIVER MODEL: Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks
• Next by Date: Re: better wake-balancing: respin
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] Process Events Connector
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Process Events Connector
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]