Re: [PATCH] 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 net/ipv4/route.c: spin_unlock call fails to compile

* John Bowler <[email protected]> wrote:

>  #else
> -# define rt_hash_lock_addr(slot) NULL
> +# define rt_hash_lock_addr(slot) ((spinlock_t*)NULL)
>  # define rt_hash_lock_init()

looks good to me - it gives (slightly) more type safety too.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 net/ipv4/route.c: spin_unlock call fails to compile
    • From: John Bowler <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] optimize activate_task()
• Next by Date: 2.6.14: aic7xxx broken with blktool
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 net/ipv4/route.c: spin_unlock call fails to compile
• Next by thread: [PATCH] 2.6.14: NSLU2 machine support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]