to den 27.10.2005 klokka 10:23 (+0200) skreiv Miklos Szeredi: > Yes, possibility for finding out where subfilesystems are located > _will_ be missing for such filesystems as sshfs. Why? Can't lookup() notice the change in remote st_dev as you cross the filesystem boundary? For NFS the plan is to automatically submount such remote subfilesystems. That fixes a host of problems including the one that you mention w.r.t. statfs, the problem of potential duplicate inode numbers, etc. Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- References:
- [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- From: Jan Hudec <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- From: Jan Hudec <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- From: Jan Hudec <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- Prev by Date: Badness in __writeback_single_inode
- Next by Date: Re: Kernel Panic + Intel SATA
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/8] VFS: per inode statfs (core)
- Index(es):
 |