Re: [RFC patch 2/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields

        > -	.name		= "DAC960",
        > +	.driver = {
        > +		.name	= "DAC960",
        > +	},

This change looks like a (rather ugly) step backwards.  Maybe it would
be better to add the name as a parameter to pci_register_driver?

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC patch 2/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC patch 0/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
  - From: Laurent riffard <[email protected]>
- [RFC patch 2/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
  - From: Laurent riffard <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: X unkillable in R state sometimes on startx , /proc/sysrq-trigger T output attached
Next by Date: Re: [RFC patch 3/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
Previous by thread: [RFC patch 2/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
Next by thread: Re: [RFC patch 2/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]