Re: [RFC patch 2/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields

        > -	.name		= "DAC960",
        > +	.driver = {
        > +		.name	= "DAC960",
        > +	},

This change looks like a (rather ugly) step backwards.  Maybe it would
be better to add the name as a parameter to pci_register_driver?

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC patch 2/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC patch 0/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
    • From: Laurent riffard <[email protected]>
  • [RFC patch 2/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
    • From: Laurent riffard <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: X unkillable in R state sometimes on startx , /proc/sysrq-trigger T output attached
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC patch 3/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
• Previous by thread: [RFC patch 2/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC patch 2/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]