Re: Notifier chains are unsafe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Andreas Kleen wrote:

> > Note that the RCU documentation says RCU critical sections are not
> > allowed
> > to sleep.
> 
> In this case it would be ok.

I don't understand.  If it's okay for an RCU critical section to sleep in 
this case, why wouldn't it be okay always?  What's special here?

Aren't there requirements about critical sections finishing on the same 
CPU as they started on?

Can you please explain in more detail?

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux