On Wednesday 26 October 2005 00:44, Blaisorblade wrote:
> For what I see, that's based on the tradeoff between space and contention -
> for instance there are few zones only, so there's no big waste.
If space is precious it shouldn't be padded at all.
> In practice, interpreting !X86_GENERIC as "I will run this kernel on _this_
> processor" could also be done.
That is what it always meant yes.
> However, in case you didn't note, max_align is never enough on EM64T
> currently, right?
I will prepare patches for .15 to remove it completely, that should fix that
problem.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
