On Wednesday 26 October 2005 00:13, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso wrote:
>
> I.e. the implementation was written, is present in the tree, but due to
> this:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK
> #include <linux/rwsem-spinlock.h> /* use a generic implementation */
> #else
> #include <asm/rwsem.h> /* use an arch-specific implementation */
> #endif
>
> it was probably _NEVER_ compiled!!!
Actually it was, but we switched it back because there were some doubts
on the correctness of the xchg based implementation and the generic
one looked much cleaner. So far nobody showed a significant performance
different too.
I should probably remove asm/rwsem.h.
Don't apply please.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
