Paul Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Takahashi-san wrote:
> > I realized CPUSETS has another problem around pdflush.
>
> Excellent observation. I had not realized this.
>
> Thank-you for pointing it out.
>
> I don't have plans. Do you have any suggestions?
Per-zone dirty thresholds (quite messy), per-zone writeback (horrific,
linear searches or data structure proliferation everywhere).
Let's see a (serious) worload/testcase first, hey? vmscan.c writeback off
the LRU is a bit slow, but we should be able to make it suffice.
> ( Anyone know what the "pd" stands for in pdflush ?? )
"page dirty"? It's what bdflush became when writeback went from
being block-based to being page-based.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
