Re: [PATCH] propogate gfp_t changes further

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> Linus, maybe I should just send the entire series your way?  Unless you
> are planning to push 2.6.14 Real Soon Now(tm), it would make sense...

2.6.14 got delayed by a week due to some bugs, but the last one that I 
have on my worry-plate has a patch (I'm just waiting for an ack on it).

So yes, RSN.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] propogate gfp_t changes further
    • From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] propogate gfp_t changes further
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ipmi: use refcount in message handler
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/9] mm: split page table lock
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] propogate gfp_t changes further
• Next by thread: The fasync_cache grows. Possible leak in kernel 2.6.13.4.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]