Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)

I wrote:

     1. renovate the core (thereby break all command set drivers and
        all transport subsystems),
     2. update ~2 command set drivers and ~2 transport subsystems
     3. validate the renovated core,
     4. fix the conceptual errors of the renovated core (as well as
        first few discovered bugs in the implementation),
     5. update all other command set drivers,
     6. update all transport subsystems where resources to do so are
        available,

Step 6 probably involves the creation of a SPI transport layer. It implements former SPI related functionality of the core and may receive former code of the core. BTW, it may be a good idea to really defer this to step 6 instead of doing so in step 2.

--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=-= =-=- =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: /etc/mtab and per-process namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: interrupts are not shared between CPUs in 2.6.14-rc3
• Previous by thread: Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attachedPHYs)
• Next by thread: Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]