Re: False positive (well not really) on RT backward clock check

On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 10:59 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > This is at the moment where the clock source is switched over. I check
> > what might be the reason.
> > 
> > John, any idea ?
> 
> This is using the B7 tod code, correct? If so, B8 corrected a problem
> specifically with changing clocksources (most easily seen while changing
> to the TSC based clocksource), so I would not be surprised if this is
> the same bug.

Thanks, will rebase to B8

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • False positive (well not really) on RT backward clock check
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: False positive (well not really) on RT backward clock check
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: False positive (well not really) on RT backward clock check
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: False positive (well not really) on RT backward clock check
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: False positive (well not really) on RT backward clock check
    • From: john stultz <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
• Next by Date: Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
• Previous by thread: Re: False positive (well not really) on RT backward clock check
• Next by thread: Re: question about code from the linux kernel development ( se ) book
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]