Re: [PATCH] Fix Kconfig performance bug

[David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>]

On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:46:30AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, David Gibson wrote:
> 
> > When doing its recursive dependency check, scripts/kconfig/conf uses
> > the flag SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE to avoid rechecking a symbol it has already
> > checked.  However, that flag is only set at the top level, so if a
> > symbol is first encountered as a dependency of another symbol it will
> > be rechecked every time it is encountered until it's encountered at
> > the top level.
> 
> You're correct, the check does too much.
> 
> > Index: working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- working-2.6.orig/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c	2005-10-20 12:40:45.000000000 +1000
> > +++ working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c	2005-10-20 12:41:43.000000000 +1000
> > @@ -758,6 +758,8 @@
> >  out:
> >  	if (sym2)
> >  		printf(" %s", sym->name);
> > +	else
> > +		sym->flags |= SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE;
> >  	sym->flags &= ~SYMBOL_CHECK;
> >  	return sym2;
> >  }
> 
> Actually this way it becomes redundant with SYMBOL_CHECKED, could you 
> merge these two flags? The above check would be also probably better:

Ok, done.  There is now only SYMBOL_CHECKED (seemed a clearer name to
me), but it's semantics are like those of SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE were.

> 	if (sym2) {
> 		printf(" %s", sym->name);
> 		if (sym2 == sym) {
> 			printf("\n");
> 			sym2 = NULL;
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> So that this check will stop when it hits the start symbol and continue 
> looking for more dependency problems, which is I think I intended with the 
> original code.

Erm.. ok.  I don't entirely understand the intent of this is, but
applied anyway.

> > Index: working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y
> > ===================================================================
> > --- working-2.6.orig/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y	2005-10-20 12:40:45.000000000 +1000
> > +++ working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y	2005-10-20 12:41:43.000000000 +1000
> > @@ -495,10 +495,9 @@
> >  		exit(1);
> >  	menu_finalize(&rootmenu);
> >  	for_all_symbols(i, sym) {
> > +/* 		fprintf(stderr, "Checking %s...\n", sym->name); */
> 
> One "quilt refresh" missing? :-)

Oops.  Something like that.

Oh.. one caveat, the diffs I have here to zconf.tab.c_shipped are
direct edits to match zconf.y - I didn't regenerate the file with
bison.  I've done that to getting a whole lot of irrelevant changes in
the patch because I'm using a different version of bison to that used
for the existing zconf.tab.[ch]_shipped

Anyway, revised version below:

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

Index: working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c
===================================================================
--- working-2.6.orig/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c	2005-10-21 11:29:33.000000000 +1000
+++ working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c	2005-10-21 11:41:07.000000000 +1000
@@ -731,14 +731,14 @@
 	struct symbol *sym2;
 	struct property *prop;
 
-	if (sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE)
+	if (sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHECKED)
 		return NULL;
 	if (sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHECK) {
 		printf("Warning! Found recursive dependency: %s", sym->name);
 		return sym;
 	}
 
-	sym->flags |= (SYMBOL_CHECK | SYMBOL_CHECKED);
+	sym->flags |= SYMBOL_CHECK;
 	sym2 = sym_check_expr_deps(sym->rev_dep.expr);
 	if (sym2)
 		goto out;
@@ -756,8 +756,15 @@
 			goto out;
 	}
 out:
-	if (sym2)
+	if (sym2) {
 		printf(" %s", sym->name);
+		if (sym2 == sym) {
+			printf("\n");
+			sym2 = NULL;
+		}
+	} else {
+		sym->flags |= SYMBOL_CHECKED;
+	}
 	sym->flags &= ~SYMBOL_CHECK;
 	return sym2;
 }
Index: working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y
===================================================================
--- working-2.6.orig/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y	2005-10-21 11:29:33.000000000 +1000
+++ working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y	2005-10-21 11:31:01.000000000 +1000
@@ -497,8 +497,6 @@
 	for_all_symbols(i, sym) {
                 if (!(sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHECKED) && sym_check_deps(sym))
                         printf("\n");
-		else
-			sym->flags |= SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE;
         }
 
 	sym_change_count = 1;
Index: working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c_shipped
===================================================================
--- working-2.6.orig/scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c_shipped	2005-10-21 11:29:33.000000000 +1000
+++ working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c_shipped	2005-10-21 11:29:37.000000000 +1000
@@ -1935,8 +1935,6 @@
 	for_all_symbols(i, sym) {
                 if (!(sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHECKED) && sym_check_deps(sym))
                         printf("\n");
-		else
-			sym->flags |= SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE;
         }
 
 	sym_change_count = 1;
Index: working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
===================================================================
--- working-2.6.orig/scripts/kconfig/expr.h	2005-05-24 14:12:26.000000000 +1000
+++ working-2.6/scripts/kconfig/expr.h	2005-10-21 11:30:13.000000000 +1000
@@ -93,7 +93,6 @@
 #define SYMBOL_NEW		0x0800
 #define SYMBOL_AUTO		0x1000
 #define SYMBOL_CHECKED		0x2000
-#define SYMBOL_CHECK_DONE	0x4000
 #define SYMBOL_WARNED		0x8000
 
 #define SYMBOL_MAXLENGTH	256


-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/