On Thursday, October 20, 2005 7:14 am, Alan Cox wrote:
> Now that libata is beginning to behave well I'd vote for that option,
> however in kernel libata lacks several essential items for PATA
> feature parity (HPA, ATAPI, suspend/resume, correct tuning). It's
> getting there and I've got some more stuff waiting for Jeff, but it
> isn't there yet
Yeah, that seems like the best thing to do in the long run. Of course it
has to wait until libata at least has ATAPI support I'd imagine. Jeff
also mentioned that it would require changes to the legacy IDE driver to
prevent it from binding to certain PCI devices (and given that it just
uses I/O ports that might get hackish).
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
